View Single Post
Old 07-03-2008, 13:16   #146
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Should Prince Harry go to Iraq?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostandconfused View Post
lol alfayed doesnt own house of fraiser or the ritz!
ritz paris maybe but not the one in london.
Seeing as you love to research so much and read books etc. Can i suggest you have a look at alfayed's webiste. Its not really difficult to find but ive attatched a link for your viewing pleasure.

http://www.alfayed.com/business%20interests.aspx
I used to have to support the servers which host that site...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tweetypie/8 View Post
i am p..... off listening about harry he is supposed to be a soldier why shouldnt he be sent to iraq,
It's been covered several times, but lets go again

1. He was sent to a warzone, not Iraq but Afghanistan
2. He was there until some scrote of a yank decided to make some more money and breach the media blackout.
3. Taliban forces have made it clear that if he was sent into their area, they would expend all required resources to capture and behead him. This would make the lives of other soldiers in the same area (not just his group) much more dangerous due to the influx of fighters. This is what's known as a "very bad thing"
4. The MoD (despite appearances) has a duty of care towards it's soldiers to not put them in unnecessary danger (please, stop laughing), and as such was able to use this as an excuse to try and not be responsible for the death of the 3rd heir to the throne.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote