Quote:
Originally Posted by shawty
You willing to make a list of all the egineers in the world and prove 80% agree it was a controlled demolition, no? Thought not. Anyway, they are engineers, you would be talking to the wrong people if you are talking about a controlled demolition.
What do you think crashed into the pentagon? I mean a missile cant bounce of 3 lamposts, hit something else, then stay on course to hit the pentagon and then leave wreckage of the plane they where pretending it had hit.
WTC7, was on fire for hours, http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11images/fig3.jpg, dont you think the fires would of set off the explosives used to bring down WTC7.
Do you know how long it takes to rig up a building for a controlled demolition and how many people it takes? You think this was done in two of the largest buildings in the world and another big building, without anyone seeing?
Silverstone says "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." Meaning pull the firemen out of the recue operation. Why would you risk saying it to billions of people and blowing your whole cover. Same with Bush and the whole seen the first plane hit. Same as the BBC and saying it had collapsed before it had, what thats meant to prove though im not quite sure.
How many do you think would have to be in on this conspiracy? So far we have parts of the American Goverment, The BBC, the faked phone calls from the planes, which means the familys myust be in on it to, Larry Silverstone and the billions of people he has told it was actually a demolition (which he doesnt of course) some people in the military who fired the missile into the pentagon (where did that missile come from) all the eye witnesses who had seen a missile type thing,, oh Ill shut up, I think everyone reading this apart from you gets my drift.
Before doing research wether it be for either side, think logically first. |
LOL @ meaning to pull the firemen out the building i watched the program on bbc you scapegoater, they physically were talking about world trade centre 7 at the time. Its a prooven fact you think people would use that as evidence if it was referring to the firemen you really are insane.
People underestimate how well this is thought out.
And as for how many would be involved in the conspiracy as far as that goes most people wont even be aware of what there doing besides intelligence agencies whose job it is to do that and has been for years anyway as EX CIA and MI5 and MI6 have clearly shown us in there revelations.
+ the amount of papers n past evidence showing the CIA n other intelligence agencies are involved in mass drug trafficking.
a plane hit the pentagon obviously, but a missile hit it aswell as is apparent or it was blew up via an explosive device, and notice the area that was blown up was the a navy sector this was because theres an internal intelligence agency war between intelligence agencies with certain members joining together wanting to expose the truth.
and before 9/11 there was a drill in which the building was searched for bombs by a bomb squad this is well known and mentioned alot publically this, they could easily of planted explosives in the building that is not a factor especially with this revelation of people removed from the building in advance.
lol and saying it collapsed before it even had shows they were told to report it before it had even happened meaning the reuters knew about it in advance which is a big indication to the fact it was an inside job and planned and blueprinted. A perfectly carried out event which has led to the war on iraq and the ever going war on terrorism which is a farce to bring in the new world order and as years have gone by ive known this and seen it come true so i certainly know whose living in fantasies when people tell me "your delusional".
and by the way most the people dont even know what there doing that reporter would of just reported it she has no idea she reported it before the incident took place. If she got showed she might ask questions but you couldnt put the link together so i doubt she would.
It works through the employment control system you know on a need to know basis on what your doing, if your jobs that high you find out about the secrets behind 9/11 your gonna be in the position to keep it under wraps. Such as The CIA, politicians n alike people who are freemasons n have all pledged they will protect there brother freemasons no matter what and carried out initiations which involve placing your hand on a skull n pledging your soul to lucifer.
and world trade centre 7 if you seriously think it was brought down by a fire. You are living in disney land florida im deadly serious i can tell thats a controlled demolition a mile off, the fact you've got larry admitting it prooves my point exactly, you've just attempted to take his words out of context to fit your reality.
hitler done the same in his country to trigger a war, its politics mate and ill show you the hardcore proof as time goes on on this forum i suggest you read like i say alice in wonderland and the world trade centres by david icke its pretty undeniable to see you've been fed a pure n utter movie smoke screen reality of what took place n why it took place.
I mean your trying to make out its more logical a guy in a cave commited this sitting there with his ak47's and invaded one of the most secure nations on the planet when its prooven the air control in america is tight as hell, let alone crashing into the pentagon, thats all intentional and its so obvious.
---------- Post added at 04:44 ---------- Previous post was at 04:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
There's one touchstone I always use on 9/11 conspiracies, which is to work out whether the writer knows how aircraft are built and behave in crashes. If they don't, which is most of the conspiracy theorists, I bin them.
I was at university with Mohammed Atta. Not sure if I mentioned it before. Strangely enough he wasn't down the student bar a lot.
|
that sounds like real great logic.
dismiss absulotely everything which is a hell of a alot of inconsistencies with the official 9/11 story if people dont understand how aircrafts are built.