View Single Post
Old 20-02-2008, 18:39   #32
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Nice One Porsche

Quote:
Originally Posted by alferret View Post
I dont like Ken Leninspart, I dont like him for what he used to stand for and for what he stands for now. If I want to drive my Porsche or X5 through london why should I be penalised. Why should I have to pay because of my emmisions being slightly more than a fart when there are a huge amount of oil burners still poluting London passing themselves off for taxi's and buses.
Which all meet the new emission requirements for a Low Emission Zone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu View Post
<snip>the US Embassy, has already said that they won't pay the CC,
Quote:
Originally Posted by alferret View Post
Regardless of what guise it comes in, its another tax and NOT a charge for a service.
We pay vehicle tax already, we pay through the nose for fuel (due to the governments taxation on fuel) and now we get taxed if we drive through London.
I see we have the US Embassys defence down pat. This is there arguement, it is a tax not a charge (and governments do not tax other governments). I guess they won't mind when the British Consulate in NYC does not pay the charges when they put a similar zone in Manhattan.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote