Cable Forum - View Single Post - Can you post ping plotter image please to IP address 82.133.85.65

Cerberus · 06-02-2008, 16:23

C:\Documents and Settings\Chilli>ping 82.133.85.65 -n 20

Pinging 82.133.85.65 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 24ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Chilli>

Location: South Lanarkshire cpc3-ruth2.renf.cable.ntl.com

May I also ask your reasoning for this?

06-02-2008, 16:23	#2
Cerberus Permanently Banned Join Date: Dec 2004 Age: 50 Posts: 978	Re: Can you post ping plotter image please to IP address 82.133.85.65 C:\Documents and Settings\Chilli>ping 82.133.85.65 -n 20 Pinging 82.133.85.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53 Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 24ms C:\Documents and Settings\Chilli> Location: South Lanarkshire cpc3-ruth2.renf.cable.ntl.com May I also ask your reasoning for this?