View Single Post
Old 31-01-2008, 14:10   #22
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: Landmark Law Lords Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing View Post
It will, actually, but the ruling gives the judge discretion to decide whether it's in the interests of justice to proceed with the case outside the three year limitation. This is much more relevant to people, for example, abused at the age of 10 for whom it's clearly against the interests of justice to force them to launch a legal action by age 13, particularly if they're in the care of the body they're suing, or quite probably have resources or family or legal expertise to fall back on. The Lotto Rapist angle does hide the main point here.
And since few, if any, judges will proceed with something which isn't in the interests of justice, spurious cases will fail.
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote