View Single Post
Old 31-01-2008, 12:47   #21
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Landmark Law Lords Ruling

Quote:
As I understand it, it will NOT be possible for just anyone to appear out of the woodwork years after the event, make spurious claims and then launch an action
It will, actually, but the ruling gives the judge discretion to decide whether it's in the interests of justice to proceed with the case outside the three year limitation. This is much more relevant to people, for example, abused at the age of 10 for whom it's clearly against the interests of justice to force them to launch a legal action by age 13, particularly if they're in the care of the body they're suing, or quite probably have resources or family or legal expertise to fall back on. The Lotto Rapist angle does hide the main point here.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote