View Single Post
Old 30-01-2008, 00:35   #32
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Another MP in trouble?

Sorry? Again, this is Britain, the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused!

Is there a legal or parlimental requirement to keep timesheets or evidence of work? No, there wasn't, and that's why he's not been punished for that.
Should there be? Yes, it makes sense, but you can't make the introduction of such a requirement retroactive can you?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote