Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNorm
Oops - you did say that earlier!
So what is all the fuss about?
|
Lack of evidence that the work done was actually done by him. I say it like that because the comittee have said the work needed doing, and he was qualified to do it, and if there was evidence that it hadn't been done, surely that would be evidence that he hadn't done it, therefore there must be evidence that the work has been done, just no evidence as to who actually did the work.
Hmm, person employed and paid for work, person qualified for work required, work done, but lets get uppety because they didn't fill in timesheets etc.
Oh and they said the bonuses he gave his son were larger than they should have been.
Course, the BNP candidate who brought this investigation didn't have an axe to grind over losing the election while standing as an Independant, oh no, definitely not.