View Single Post
Old 29-01-2008, 00:18   #15
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Another MP in trouble?

So he paid his son 6% more than the middle of the lowest payscale, for work which his son was qualified for and the comittee agreed needed doing, yet was still well below the maximum he could have paid his son?
So the only real issue is lack of proof that the work was done, strange, surely there would be evidence that the important work which needed doing wasn't done, and that his son was given bonuses?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote