Thread: Nuclear Logic?
View Single Post
Old 22-01-2008, 14:09   #17
Stuart W
Inactive
 
Stuart W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: E14 9SD
Services: BroadBand 4M
Posts: 619
Stuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to allStuart W is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to Stuart W
Re: Nuclear Logic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing View Post
And dirty bombs, as we know, aren't really that scary*. The 'suitcase nuke', in the sense of a suitcase-sized city-destroyer, are the myth.
I cant even begin to comment on how scary dirty bombs are.... ask anyone from Chernobyl!

As for suitcase sized bombs, ask yourself a couple of questions....

1: What is the fourth protocol about? (to save you googling, it's an agreement not to sneak small nukes in to citys and detonate them)
2: Uranium less than half the size of a dime was used in Nagasaki.

Simple fact is, you CAN build small nuclear devices if you really want to.
Stuart W is offline   Reply With Quote