View Single Post
Old 20-01-2008, 17:27   #37
Arthurgray50@blu
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Fears over Taser gun expansion

This really gets my goat, that people bring in there Human Rights crap, and how powerful these taser guns are, what we have in this country, is the laws are far too soft, if police officers are forced to face a lot of yobbos, who are terrosing someone, then they should be able to use any force nessersary, wether it is a taser, or water cannon(although not in this country) or batons, dogs, or horses, then they should use, human rights, to me they have thrown that out of the window, they commit a crime, thats it, they don't have any HR, we already have a system, where some do gooder will come along and say, they might have committed a crime, but they still have rights, absolute tosh.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote