Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
We should be angry at the lawyers, who put the case that (again from the Mail) - [I]"Lawyers said the conviction for manslaughter was not safe, arguing that Mr Norton's death could not be laid at the boys' door because the pensioner had a heart condition – he had a triple bypass in 1977."[/I]
|
Of course it wasn't safe - his death was clearly just a co-incidence and nothing whatsoever to do with being attacked, verbally abused and stoned by a mob of thugs.....
