[Raistlin]

At a hearing before the appeal judges on Thursday Mark Wall QC, challenging the safety of the manslaughter convictions, argued that it could not be established which of the allegedly "unlawful or dangerous" actions, if any of them, had contributed to Mr Norton's heart attack.

Shall I tell you which of the 'unlawful or dangerous' actions is was, Mark Wall QC? It was the 'unlawful (and)or dangerous' action of attacking someone with stones and lobbing them at their head! If you'd like to pull your head out of your ass I'll be more than happy to demonstrate the principle to you just in case you don't bloody get it!

Yes, they are children, but don't try to tell me they didn't know what they were doing. BECAUSE OF THEIR ACTIONS A MAN DIED! They may not have intended it, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't their fault! Lock them away, take away their 'lives' the way they deprived someone else of his.