Well, the BBC's editorial complaints unit has finished investigating this program, they have concluded that the programme, while essentially correct to bring up the worries presented the facts in an unbalanced way. In fact they had three scientists who were presenting the case for the notion that Wifi radiation is bad, one presenting the case against. They also unfairly called the independance of the man who was against into question. The ECU seem to have completely ignored the fact that, IIRC, one of the people presenting the case for the notion was actively engaged in selling protection gear.
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...ewed-wi-report