Thread: O2 Broadband
View Single Post
Old 18-10-2007, 16:57   #17
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: O2 Broadband

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro1 View Post

Yep would need to be as ADSL2 is worse after a mile from it.

A cable connection... Not possible down a bt line.

Much the same the second time but heck get that down a bt line.
Why we love cable.
You appear to be getting confused with ADSL. ADSL 2+ is still affected by distance, but nowhere near as badly as ADSL. ADSL 2+ has been good to me, and I admit, I do live near an exchange. I am perfectly aware that people don't necessarily all get good service on ADSL.

But, the same is true (but for different reasons) on Cable. With ADSL, you get speed problems because of bad network condition, or distance from exchange. With virgin, you get speed problems because of bad network condition or area oversubscription. Not all Cable customers get bad service. I didn't when I had broadband through an STB, and I don't on DTV. Similarly, I don't get bad service on ADSL.

Yet, I know people who havehad problems with both technologies.

So, I am definately not saying ADSL is better, but it is a good alternative.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote