Quote:
Originally Posted by peanutkp
Foreverwar, I don't have the answers, I don't have everything presented in front of me, laid out in a such a way that the answers flow so easy to me, sorry about that.
I don't like your tone that mostly all you do is argue the case rather than adding your own thoughts. To me that's very easy to do. Is it points that you are trying to score from certain people?
No one here is saying that the parents are to blame for the disappearance of the girl (yet, maybe, or never), but there are people are saying they do have something to answer to/for.
If people can say the parents ARE innocent, then as equal as that they can be guilty (as of this moment in time). To say one way or the other and say that is 'FACT', now that is opinionated, prejudice and pointless and not worth the paper it's printed on.
|
I have tried to present a balanced case based on facts, not emotions or tabloid reporting, so I am sorry you don't like my tone - if you had read my posts, you would have seen that I was defending the principle of "presumed innocent until proven guilty", whilst also stating that I believed they were negligent in leaving the children alone.
I am not trying to score points, just pointing out discrepancies in people's positions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by slug
Well said. Some people just cant except that other people might not agree with their opinion. It must make their lives very difficult.
|
Not in the least - I just try and base my reasoning and beliefs on reported facts from official sources, not reported innuendo and latest breaking news/leaks which are contradicted hours/a day later.
I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion - it's just a shame when posters descend to guarded insults when they are disagreed with.
