Quote:
Originally Posted by peanutkp
Now we're going back to the start. The question is what is a bad decision? Can you prove what they did was a bad decision, a one off or the norm for them? Would that still fit the bad decision or verge into the neglectful area? Can you prove that they didn't sedate the kids whilst they went out on the razz? Would that still be a bad decision then? None of it so far can be proved, nor disapproved, and therefore it's hard to be defensive on their part just yet.
|
If you cannot prove it either way then the default position should be innocent until proven guilty. You cant disprove a negative so under that logic people would always remain possibly guilty.