Quote:
Originally Posted by peanutkp
Now we're going back to the start. The question is what is a bad decision? Can you prove what they did was a bad decision, a one off or the norm for them? Would that still fit the bad decision or verge into the neglectful area? Can you prove that they didn't sedate the kids whilst they went out on the razz? Would that still be a bad decision then? None of it so far can be proved, nor disapproved, and therefore it's hard to be defensive on their part just yet.
|
Well this is exactly the kind of thing that the Times Journo is writing about.
1. I am not, as nor is anyone else, in possession of the facts.
2. I am, however, firstly and foremostly believing that they are innoccent unless otherwise proved, so it is not hard for me to be defensive on their part.
3. I am also making part of my judgement based on what I have seen of their character and that they are both professional people, they wouldn't fit into my profile of neglective parents.
As you say it cannot be proved, and until something is brought out contrary to that, then they will always get the B.O.D from me.