View Single Post
Old 17-09-2007, 00:06   #1360
TheNorm
Inactive
 
TheNorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
TheNorm has a nice shiny star
TheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny star
Re: Toddler 'abducted' during holiday

Quote:
Originally Posted by XFS03 View Post
They are not innocent or guilty, they are presumed innocent......
Didn't several thousand people sign a petition demanding that social services investigate the McCann's (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/l...re/6740315.stm)? Doesn't sound like a presumption of innocence to me!

Quote:
Originally Posted by XFS03 View Post
...how many other innocent people has he helped? Ian Huntley? Harold Shipman? Doesn't everbody, no matter who they are, deserve a fair hearing?
Both examples had a fair hearing, with the vast majority of the facts published during and after the trial. The way the McCann's are being treated can hardly be called a fair hearing.

As for Sir Richard's motives for giving the money, I have no idea. The fact that he might be spending his money selectively shouldn't matter.
TheNorm is offline   Reply With Quote