Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
<snip>
Your question of how the body would be moved holds much providence. But if the blood in the hire car is the childs then it renders your question pretty much mute.
BBC24 raised an interesting question this morning which was that if that hire car was so important to the investigation why were the McCanns still allowed to use it
|
That would be moot.
And in fact it wouldn't be moot; if the child's blood is in the car, it proves the child was in the car, or that someone who had been in contact with the child's blood had been in the car. It certainly doesn't prove the allegation that the child's parents hired the car in order to move a body.
---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanutkp
Not the grammer / spell checking police again. 
Wow that was really helpful. |
It's more helpful than you realise.
There are so many armchair Poirots on this thread, it's reasonable to wonder whether some of them really do have the wit and intelligence to crack a case that has so far stumped the (presumably) finest investigative minds in Portugal, and one or two from the UK as well.
Personally, I tend to give less weight to 'clever' theories espoused by people who can't string a properly constructed sentence together. Call me old fashioned, but as a means of separating out who is really thinking about this, and who is merely pandering to ugly prejudice and confusing real life with soap opera and pulp fiction, I find it works pretty well.