Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
...2) Sources to support crime scene contamination ?
|
firstly this:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappe...tuguese_police
"Controversy ensued on 17 June when Chief Inspector Olegário de Sousa said that the presence of so many people in the apartment from which Madeleine disappeared, after she was found to be missing, complicated the work of the scientific team. He added that this could have destroyed all the evidence and could prove to be fatal for the investigation."
the presence of so many people in the apartment from which Madeleine disappeared, after she was found to be missing=contaminated
then this:-
"However, the British police team, brought in to assist, in early August found microscopic traces of blood on the wall of the apartment from which Madeleine disappeared and that had not been detected by the Portuguese police. Using specially-trained sniffer dogs and ultraviolet technology they discovered the blood despite the apartment having being cleaned and reoccupied"
apartment having being cleaned and reoccupied=contaminated
---------- Post added at 14:49 ---------- Previous post was at 14:48 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
Aren't the new developments a result of the UK forensic tests?
|
correct but some of the results are on tests done within the apartment in August long after Madeline went missing and after the room was contaminated. I dont see how any of this evidence from the apartment could be 'sound' considering that the scene wasn't as undisturbed as possible. Also the chance of a fair trial is ruined because evidence to prove they're (whoever is in the dock) innocent might have also been destroyed by post scene contamination.