Quote:
Originally Posted by sherer
I know FIFA said they couldn't deal with it and pass it to CAS but from what youare saying it seems they aren't going down that route.
i think part of the problem is that West Ham ripped up one contract and just create a new one and now MSI say the orig contract is still valid. I think might have got that wrong  |
You have it right but if it's an issue why didn't Kia Joorbawhatever say anything in April? Also if a clause in a contract is illegal does that make the whole contract illegal? If so and we lose this case, Sheff Utd cannot fail to win an action against the Premier League for allowing us to play him. Or if it's only the clause in the contract was illegal and once removed, the contract became valid as has been muted, Kia is screwed and we get the cash, don't we?
Pure speculation really, I am no lawyer and don't have much of a clue regarding this issue but seeing as that doesn't stop Dave Whelan or the Daily Mail, who cares
Here is a link about CAS and the court case
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/6912571.stm