View Single Post
Old 10-07-2007, 08:51   #8
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Has the world gone mad?

Quote:
presumably would be sufficient for some kind of charge to be brought?
Defence lawyer - 'my client was innocently picking up items fully intending to purchase them, Your Worship'.

There can still be a conviction if they can prove intent to deprive the shop of the items in question, which is presumably a bit easier to prove if you're walking out with them rather than round the shop. It'd be interesting to know if the presence or absence of the means to pay for the items would be admissible - think of some absent minded lady with a basket full of stuff and who left her purse at home.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote