Quote:
Originally Posted by Druchii
As long as your line can have fast path enabled, then yes, ADSL2+ could possibly have better ping times.
Although in all honesty, why would you want to beat 15ms? I doubt it would make much of a difference. My ping:
Code:
C:\Documents and Settings\X>ping bbc.co.uk
Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.131] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=117
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=117
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=117
Ping statistics for 212.58.224.131:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 18ms
|
Code:
C:\Users\Dragon>ping 212.58.224.131
Pinging 212.58.224.131 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=115
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=115
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=115
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 212.58.224.131:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms
About the same from my ADSL (NOT ADSL2+) line which is on fastpath.