Quote:
Originally Posted by freezin
So you really believe the state has the right to limit freedom of speech? To scrutinise our opinions for acceptability?
|
Do you believe individuals have the right to harm others freely?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freezin
No I'm not Xaccers, I have consistently allowed for the fact that not all of the facts have been made public. But on the balance of what we do know, I am inclined to believe the girl was upset at being asked to work with a group she could not understand. I have made my position clear: had the girl made a racially motivated stand, the incident should have been dealt with in-school.
|
Hang on, at least one of them reportedly can speak english, so what's the issue?
Would you also refuse to work with a group if only one could speak English?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freezin
Yes. And in answer to your second question, GMP officers themselves did not take further action, releasing her without charge, and they take "hate crime reports very seriously" so it seems she did not say anything worthy of further action.
|
Which is their perogative.
I saw someone smash my window, he was arrested and later released, does that mean I was wrong to report him to the police?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freezin
Oh yes, I have definitely considered that! I think there is a very good chance that is the official position. 
|
So why are you asking these questions if you've considered that possibility already?
PS try not to click on the indent button