View Single Post
Old 16-06-2007, 00:31   #11
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Hamas takes full control of Gaza

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
Ah, so it's ok for Fatah to be removed by force because they don't have WMD's, but it's not ok to remove Saddam by force because he didn't have WMD's?
Interesting.
No, you've missed the point and are jumping to conclusions. You drew an analogy between two scenarios - both of which are uniquely identifiable in that one was carried out on the (incorrect) premise that one party had WMD and the other wasn't.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote