Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
The last time they checked before noticing the time MAddie was abducted was 50 mins (police report based on evidence given by the parents)
I can't believe that people think its reasonable to leave 3 children under the age of 4 home alone. And so what if there are other people in the complex supposedly 'looking out ' for your kid. I have yet to read anything about the parents saying anything to anyone else to keep an eye out on their kids, more that it was an 'understanding'. No aspect of childcare was formalised or agreed or talked out.
Responsible parents? IN THIS CASE definately not.
|
I dont think anyone is they seem to avoid the question when I ask
---------- Post added at 12:22 ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Therefore placing blame on them. Which you've been doing thoughout the thread by stating that they should not have left the children.
Why shouldn't they have left the children? Because to do so left them open to abduction you've said, hence the mobile phone analogy.
Now you're trying to backtrack like a Tory front bencher being asked about Grammar schools  |
do you think its ok to leave 3 children under 4 alone while the parents go out without any proper supervision
The abductor is to blame for the abduction
The parents should not have left the children alone.
I would say the same if there was no abduction and just news of negligence
They should not have left the children because of accident fire distress other reasons ive also constantly highlighted in this thread