Quote:
Originally Posted by Incomplete
More that there's no requirement to shorten the line length and the engineers are stretched enough already without spending their time rewiring cables to reduce line lengths.
Nice conspiracy theory regarding the bandwidths but it's the same for everyone including LLU operators, some BT exchanges are really big and line length was not a consideration when they were built beyond supplying a functional voice service.
My line length is nearly triple my straight line distance by the way  |
Note there 'wasnt' a requirement but now its important. So you havent explained why they cant do it. The only reason I can think of is saving money both in the labour requirement of doing the work and the bandwidth savings from people having lower synch speeds.
Its the same with the BRAS profiles, they drop within 75 minutes of a low synch but need 3 days to increase another way to save bandwidth,
---------- Post added at 00:05 ---------- Previous post was at 00:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incomplete
LLU is especially vulnerable to this. The colo room to host OLO's DSLAMs isn't necessarily anywhere near the MDF so that run between MDF and HDF can add a fair distance with nothing BT or anyone else can really do about it.
|
BT cant do anything about their own building layouts?