Quote:
Originally Posted by helmutcheese
Clueless, another user happy to get a backwards service and pay through the nose for it compaired to other countries even some you would class as 3rd world, wonder if he would still take it lying down if the price rose more and the service had a 6GIG PM cap  |
I especially like how having an opinion that differs from yours gives you the judgement of me being clueless.
I wonder if you would take it lying down if a company put on a high rated service and took no useage policies into consideration and therefore let the entire network grind to a halt because of more and more customers continuing to push the boundaries.
I will only accept a service (in terms of braodband) to be truly limitless when we have the capacity to offer infinite bandwidth. Until that leap in quantum physics occurs I am happy to accept the fact that at some point, a line has to be drawn to ensure relative health throughout the entire network. It isn't being clueless, it is called being realistic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by helmutcheese
P.S I think you will find the problems are not high users, its lack of upgrades and cash spent over the years on the network.
|
Furthermore, when the the knowledge of NTL's negative cash flow is relatively common place, doesn't it seem a contradiction in your statement that you want them to spend money on their network, which they clearly do not possess whilst NOT charge the customer more? And you call me clueless?