Thread: Am I missing something? Aren't CRTs better?
View Single Post
Old 18-05-2007, 20:37   #17
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Am I missing something? Aren't CRTs better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C View Post
I've got a similar spec Sony to you. I bought it about 8 years ago, and, TBH, in terms of colour reproduction, it beats most of the LCDs and Plasmas I've seen. Obviously, it isn't HD, so can't match the resolution of HD stuff, but, TBH, I don't find the difference that great.
I love the picture on my Panasonic 32 flat CRT. Looking at it on DVD source it is great. I think a lot of the HD revolution is being driven by NTSC 400+ lines rather than PAL 500+line broadcasts, you can really see the difference between a 400 odd line NTSC broadcast and its HD equivilant.
SMHarman is offline