Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dragon
heres my view
with a physical object u either take it on don't
but with digital content the difference is instead of TAKEING the item you making a duplicate therefore have never actally stolen the item.
heres a hypertical (yeah i know its not possible... YET)
instead of stealing the ROLEX i point some gadet at it and PING... i have an identical rolex yet the original is still in the shop did i just steal the rolex?
another thing is i disagree with copyright as 2 people can have the same idea.
artists/bands should be producing this work for the love of the music not to make $$$ imo the artists should make their music avalable for download cheaply and cut the record co out of the loop completly as all record/movie companies are is money grabing pure and simple.
|
Hmmmmm. So as long as you don't take a physical object it is alright then?
It's OK to climb over the football ground wall to avoid paying the £20 entance fee?
It's OK to forge £50 notes as you are not taking anything?
It's OK to view TV without a TV licence as you are not taking anything?
Artists/bands should be producing this work for the love of music not to make $$$. Get real, for most of them it's their job and they need to get paid in order to live. On the same priciple should actors, footballers, etc do the job for love? Should you do your job for the love of it and not get paid?
Are you bothered about how many people would be out of work if music was only available via download? Are you bothered about the vast majority of people (most people don't have PC's or other download hardware) who could never own any music if it was only available via download. Or are you only bothered about yourself and what you can get for nothing?