Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf
|
It's no so much "bad news" Daniel, rather the result of a certain non practising barrister (see earlier posts) defeating a claimants claim by advising that claimant and making legal submissions on his behalf quoting rulings which are patently irrelevant to the core of the case (point 46 of judge Cooke's summary refers).
In fairness judge Cooke could have closed a few more doors had he been minded to do so. I think consumers will benefit from his thoughts on the matter and the specific guidance he offers those who bother to read it.