Thread: how about we start a campaign to let VM know that we DONT LIKE SHAPING
View Single Post
Old 14-05-2007, 23:02   #256
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: how about we start a campaign to let VM know that we DONT LIKE SHAPING
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
What if they reply saying they don't store the information in a manner that allows them to look at details for specific dates? Are they under any obligation to store this data (given that the decision to shape is made on the data for a particular day)?

(Not being funny, just wondering)
It is interesting that VM have some tool that shapes, yet do not have any functionality to enable the end recipient of that shaping to review it, instead they suggest DUMeter which on a networked (CM connected to Router) connection is very hard to implement.

---------- Post added at 19:02 ---------- Previous post was at 19:01 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry View Post
Entirely valid points.

However, if a company is going to allege that I'm one the top 5% of abusers and treat me like one then I'd like them to be able to substantiate that allegation - be that through the DPA or in a court of law.
after all it may be your friend cloned CM/MAC address.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote