Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
You're, erroneously, assuming that I may be one of the 5%. I'm afraid you're wrong - so I'll pass on your "Come on...I'm waiting" game if you don't mind.
|
So if you are not one of the 5% why are you so uptight about STM?
What I mean is that I will believe that VM are advertising incorrectly if you, or any other member, has been cut off of the VM broadband for downloading more than 3 gigs during peak hours. Only then will I start worrying about STM.
In my opinion, people are over-reacting about this, the same way we're all going to die in our beds if we keep on driving petrol cars. I'm out on this one, I've said all I've got to say, and I'm going to stop defending the masses. *If* VM Broadband is as bad as a few of you are saying tell me:
Why they've been voted best consumer IP?
Why Broadband customer churn is only 1.6%?
Why VM have got 4 million broadband customers?
---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:21 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
thats a totally seperate matter though, the long time users understand the reasoning for that in that NTL:tw would up the speeds to compensate ,not as fast as people would like but still it happened.
however now that VM are on the lanscape, things have changed, and it appears that this traffic shaping has become part of the means by which the new faces will up the ARPU at least expense to VM, they dont seem to realise why people were ready to pay the higher rates or perhaps as their americans they think that the british will just sit back and take it.
we could talk about how they might better up the ARPU and increase userbase and i beleave there a some good ways to do that,but thats perhaps OT for this thread.
|
How on earth are VM American? Virgin is owned by Richard Branson last time I looked. A guy born and bred in the UK...?