View Single Post
Old 10-05-2007, 14:23   #122
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: how about we start a campaign to let VM know that we DONT LIKE SHAPING

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry View Post
I'd like to think that VM would be prepared were they to be challenged on the matter by an individual via the small claims process to the degree that they would be able to turn up in court with factual evidence to defend their position / actions.

I'd be shocked if they thought they could simply turn up and say "Well, we believe he had exceeded the limits".

On that basis I'd assume that the data is / would be available for daily useage.

Otherwise the implementation of Traffic Management could be "willy nilly" and we wouldn't want that now, would we?
Yes, fair points. You would think that if a decision that could be contested is made on the basis of that data, they'd hang on to the proof. Mind you, this is NTL/VM
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote