Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
It is being restricted, whether it be in the amount or the time taken is irrelevant, it is restricted.
|
you havent answered my question, i think english may be a problem here as well so lets try french...
veuillez fournir l'évidence où la quantité que vous pouvez télécharger est restreinte
---------- Post added at 12:01 ---------- Previous post was at 11:59 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedrohizzo
as for people saying traffic shaping is NOT a limit, first lets look at the dictionary definitions
un·lim·itÃƒÆ ’‚·ed
not limited; unrestricted; unconfined: unlimited trade.
lim·it·ed
confined within limits; restricted or circumscribed: a limited space; limited resources.
i'll use fake numbers because i can't be bothered to work them out but lets say hypothetically that on a 10mb connection you can download
100gb per day
and everyone lives for 100 years
on an unshaped network you get 3,650,000gb
on a shaped network you get shaped for 8 hours per day which = 82.5 gb per day
or 3,011,250 gb
while neither is technically "unlimited" one is getting less than the other while being described as having no limits. ( and i need a hobby ) lol
|
i still cannot see any evidence as to wheree you are restricted in how much you can download, the only evidence you have provided is restricting the SPEED at which you can download which is not what I asked for evidence for