View Single Post
Old 30-04-2007, 14:30   #96
TheNorm
Inactive
 
TheNorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
TheNorm has a nice shiny star
TheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny star
Re: Is it wrong to hijack your neighbours router?

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
...Nothing in there about cracking WEP or downloading illegal software - just "arrested in the UK for using another person's wireless internet access without permission."

And at the bottom of the article you quoted, was the statement -
"many users are not aware that using other networks is against the law."

Not much ambiguity about that statement, methinks.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T View Post
You can wriggle about and split hairs as much as you like - fact is, there is legal precedent. It is 'wrong'. It is dishonestly obtaining services without intent to pay.
I think these statements illustrate quite well the reason behind my queries, as you are basically saying "the law says it is wrong, therefore it is wrong", and I wanted to explore this in a bit of depth. Many people simply accept the laws made by government without question. This is a good thing from a policeman's (and politician's) point of view, but bad for debate on a discussion forum.
TheNorm is offline   Reply With Quote