Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf
The eye and the flagella are supposed to be evidence of items that are too complex to have arisen from evolution (by example, as not everything would be considered too complex). As it is, the evidence doesn't stand up, which is rather unfortunate for them as it leaves the theory unsubstantiated. If the evidence would stand up it would be problematic for the Evolution theory.
Obviously, there is no evidence that a creator exists, that is the implication/speculation. Also, I don't believe they say (out loud), that the creator is (the Christian) God.
|
Thing is, both the flagella and the eye have been shown to have design flaws(assuming for the moment that they were designed). The flagella has been shown to be a highly inefficient 'motor' and the eye(without recalling the exact biological/scientific details - maybe someone can remind me) is by no means perfect either.
So are we to expect that a being like god who defies the laws of physics and is perfect in every way, designed 2 items that are fundamentally flawed?