Quote:
Originally Posted by Action Jackson
But the argument just tends to be "We think it's it's too complex to have happened by chance, so it must be down to a creator, so god exists". No evidence is ever provided to support the claim.
What kind of argument is that?
|
The eye and the flagella are supposed to be evidence of items that are too complex to have arisen from evolution (by example, as not everything would be considered too complex). As it is, the evidence doesn't stand up, which is rather unfortunate for them as it leaves the theory unsubstantiated. If the evidence would stand up it would be problematic for the Evolution theory.
Obvously, there is no evidence that a creator exists, that is the implication/speculation. Also, I don't believe they say (out loud), that the creator is (the Christian) God.