View Single Post
Old 20-04-2007, 11:44   #411
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B View Post
Would you like me to amend your sig for you?
If I trusted you, I'd have no problem with that, but I don't, so I'd rather you kept your hands to yourself.
Besides, applying your intelligence to the quote shouldn't be an issue should it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
I'm not convinced neanderthals are an offshoot of humans. Related of course but I don't agree they are close enough to subject to the same laws. I'd be more inclined to believe God created them and gave them their natural lifespan, a short term version of apes so to speak.
If they're related, they must have a common ancester.
If the ancester of humans is Adam, then he too must be the ancester of neandethals.

I have to agree with regards to neandethals being an offshoot of humans, although I don't believe evolutionist think they're an offshoot either, more, as I said above in relation to the belief you shared with us, they had a common ancester. (your belief that you shared with us being that they are related)
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote