View Single Post
Old 20-04-2007, 10:30   #374
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B View Post
I can see what you're suggesting but I don't redard neanderthals to be close enough to humans to play by the same physical rules. I'd estimate they'd be as close as apes, who I'd be willing to believe may have evolved, but not humans. I don't see skin colour, physical features (ie oriental, negroid etc) or anything like that as being big enough differences to be considered a different species or anything along those lines. Again without wanting to sound PC, we're all still human.
Then they can't be relatives.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote