Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
I suggest you go and ask the 'most of us' you're referring to.
|
You were the one who suggested that god didn't need a creator. I was asking you why you thought that?
Why (in the view of creationists) can something as complex as the eye be deemed too complex to have happened through evolution and therefore must have a creator, yet a being like God, who must be the most complex entity in the universe(or wherever he/she/it resides) is not deemed to have had a creator?
How could someone as complex as God have happened by chance?
I just see the hypocrisy in applying one set of logic (if it's complex it must have been created) to explain the existence of God (without any physical evidence I might add), yet refuse to apply the same logic to God him/her/itself.