Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
Aspects of science, that might be more accurate. I don't believe in a lot of the closed-book stuff of science - I'm open-minded enough to be receptive to the notion that there might be something bigger than use which governs the rules of science and has plenty more up His sleeve which we are yet to understand (and indeed may never be able to).
|
This is what I dont understand, well one of the things. If there is a god then it would govern science so why is there any problem. Why cant evolution have happened but it have been gods intention? I dont see why they cannot work perfectly well together, There are many scientists who are religious.
Its cases like the one this topic was based on that cause confusion and division. Trying to push a theory which less evidence against a established scientific 'fact' as if they are equally likely. The guy behind the museum even tried to claim dinosaurs were not meat eaters until Adam and Eve...Dinosaurs existed so long before us
If you ask me, which you didnt but still, the bible (or literal interpretation of it) is the biggest conflict between religion and science and the biggest obstacle to people becoming part of a faith. Since science has never proven that a god does not exist, but it has proven that some sections of the bible are impossible. Its when that confilict happens that causes these problems.
If there was no bible or better yet people did not take for fact then there would be no problem. Everything science proved would be created by god in the mind of those who believe in him and for the rest of us it would be whatever.