Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Your logic is faulty. You, he and she are not the sole arbiters of what the author intended. The author is entitled to have a say as well and I doubt very much they would say that is what they meant. With justification too. What possible reason could they have to be deliberately misleading in such an obvious fashion that they're bound to get found out?
I suspect in this case it's just a sloppy, badly-worded piece of work by VM's marketing dept. It wouldn't be the first time.
|
Response from the author Steve Stewart Managing Director, Customer Care who signed the letter.
Quote:
Thank you for your recent communication.Your interpretation of Talk
Unlimited is correct and includes unlimited calls to 01 & 02 telephone
numbers.
These are the calls we referred to when we mentioned calls outside your call
plan.
All other calls are charged at our standard rates. The letter did not
change the terms and conditions for your call plan.
|
That makes it ok then.
Is he going to send out a less confusing letter now as that one has caused confusion as to what it means?
No, best to keep it sloppy and badly worded as normal.
---------- Post added at 14:35 ---------- Previous post was at 14:18 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Your logic is faulty. You, he and she are not the sole arbiters of what the author intended.
|
Are you saying that those who have received the letter, and those that question the letter, are not the ones who should judge what the letter means?
Who should be the one to judge what the letter means?
And you say my logic is faulty?