Quote:
Originally Posted by Downloads
As far as i am aware the person didn't say it couldn't be contested, so why does that need them to get a refund on their education? Did you get out of bed on the wrong side or something?
You said why would someone want to watch a 3 year old show... i gave you a reason. If you didn't want an answer, i wouldn't ask the question?
|
I did not say that poster specifically said a contract could not be conteseted, I suggest you read the post again.
" And the truth of the fact is, that the removal of one channel does not constitute a huge change in the services you are recieving. If virgin suddenly decided to drop the tv service say, then this is a change for which you can canel without any penalty payment. Oh and did i forget to mention i covered this in my contract law part of my course which appears to have got me a job as a lawyer
"
The above is what I am on about.
I would beg to differ on his/her opinion, that is my right, and I am sure a court would/could come to a different conclusion than the one they state.
There are some happy with VOD, thats fine, you pay your money.....
but it is certainly not something I would spend my money on given the idea behind it and the amount of problems associated with it.
---------- Post added at 12:28 ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
As many times as you want, mate - it's a (mostly) free country.
btw, "contesting" isn't winning, just challenging - could win, could lose, often based on precedent, but not always.  |
Precisely, but the " fact " is it can be " contested ".
People should not swallow the cable boy pill that the contract is watertight, thats all.