Thread: SKY VS Virgin Media
View Single Post
Old 02-03-2007, 17:37   #303
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: SKY VS Virgin Media
Quote:
Originally Posted by gooner4life View Post
Also Sky may have asked for slightly more from Virgin Media but they were taking into account the fact that they previously had arrangements with NTL and Telewest and now the companies have merged the price had to reflect the fact they would receive a SINGLE fee.

They are payed per head. No one could have both NTL and Telewest, so the total amount of subscribers is not changing. Why should Sky charge more for one company than they did for two?
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote