View Single Post
Old 01-03-2007, 16:36   #13
altis
cf.mega poster
 
altis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,499
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
Re: Should OFCOM step in?

Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginMediaSucks View Post
There's no reason (apart from capacity, I don't know) why Virgin Media couldn't rent bandwidth on the Astra system. That would liven things up a bit!
If only it were that simple!

I have a satellite radio system (or rather I did have until it packed up yesterday ) with a motorised dish. I could receive over 2000 free-to-air radio channels and, if I had wanted to, a similar number of TV channels. If my receiver had some Common Interface slots I could also have received a selection of subscription channels. However, I couldn't receive any from Sky because of their proprietary encryption system.

Unfortunately, all this comes with a very primitive EPG. You can see what the current programme is for each channel and that's about it. Also, as channels come and go, it's a pain programming them in by hand all the time.

As I understand it, the BBC broadcast their own channels, free-to-air, via Astra but they still pay Sky millions a year just to have these put in Sky's proprietary EPG system. Mr Murdoch has been very clever and has all bases covered. This is why I think it is now time for Ofcom to step in.
altis is offline   Reply With Quote