View Single Post
Old 01-03-2007, 11:23   #17
Nugget
Inactive
 
Nugget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 50
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,211
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Re: Another Take on Lost Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle View Post
Sorry but why should I go back to a medium which absolutely infuriated with terrestial insistence that every person loves soaps. I worked it out at one point 50 hours of soaps was transmitted a week. If they missed the pap it got repeated for several times and had a big sunday catch up. Not forget the saturation of reality pap like get me out here, idol etc. Once in a blue moon there is a decent film/prog but in general terms its pap.

The problem lies is the way the beeb treat the licence as bottomless pit. I would think it not far down the line the average tv monthly bill will be £200. The result many will pushed out from enjoying watching tv. When Tv first came out only the rich could afford such luxuries. Its getting to a point it will once again be a rich mans toy.

Its in the beebs best interest long term to accept licence fee is bordering to point people cannot afford it.
Nobody's saying that you should be go back to something that 'infuriated' you. What I'm saying is that you shouldn't complain about a system that you have chosen to 'buy into' - if you don't want to pay over and above the licence fee for TV, you don't have to. Anyway, as has been repeated ad nauseum, the licence fee also pays for the radio and internet services (amongst others), so it's not actually a massive fee when you take it all into account...
Nugget is offline   Reply With Quote