View Single Post
Old 24-02-2007, 12:34   #9
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 44
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Are Sky News and The Sun besmirching Virgin name with hysterical reporting?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyHopper View Post
I'll call that a shot across the bow



Do I need to prefix every claim with an 'allegedly' or does
that afford no special protection? And if not, what areas
do I need to steer clear of? And how can I sustain
an imaginative hypothesis, and express my
right for publishing paranoid fantasy
and keep the sleeping dragon
within its docility?

And is the legal onus on me, or the forum?

Thanks for your patience

Legally its a grey area. I think the ultimate responsibility belongs to the poster, however the forum is complicit as the medium responsible for transmitting the libellous comments. The forum will remove anything libellous, or what can be reasonably, as its stipulated in our terms and conditions. However, we kindly ask posters to avoid getting us to that point.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill C View Post
No i think it means dont knock $ky there never in the wrong.
Ahh, yes, the old i'm-Murdoch's-puppet argument again

Noticing I am not quashing this thread. Merely asking posters to avoid posting libellous remarks. It doesn't matter who or what its regarding. Posting libellous comments is against our T&Cs.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote