View Single Post
Old 24-02-2007, 10:46   #18
Carl J
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Carl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of lightCarl J is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Sky misleading information

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyCambs View Post
Thanks Carl - my area shows NTL - which is now Virgin Media of course - as the top speed - thats for the town and county too.

Are you a Sky employee then?
Excellent, then potentially for you it's the best choice That withstanding my point remains. The free Sky package is only 2Mbit and there will be a lot of customers not on ADSL2+.

Point is that lines that can do 10Mbit aren't as uncommon as you might think

Me an employee? No, I just have that custom title for the entertainment value

---------- Post added at 11:46 ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by brundles View Post
Those are only averages though. It takes no account of the VM split in customers between those on 2MB (more likely given the deal packages) and those on 10MB. It also makes no distinction between speed tests done on LLU (with those on the paid LLU being more likely to try a speed test) and those without LLU.

The problem with averages is that for a survey like that there are way too many factors to take into account.

The area I live in proves that - TW averages 5MB while Sky only averages 4. How does that compare with the 3.4 and 3?
Erm I'd say TW score 2Mbit higher and Sky 0.6Mbit higher

Yes of course there are many factors I was merely using that data to counter some points regarding performance.

If Sky's customers take a higher average speed that just suggests that Virgin's higher speed packages are overpriced and Sky are better at upselling. Telewest were better with upselling than ntl as well as I remember.
Carl J is offline   Reply With Quote